Accessibility news
The changes that move accessibility work, each one dated and sourced. No commentary, no press releases, and nothing we have not read on a primary source.
Accessibility news is mostly noise: awards, product launches, and a headline about a lawsuit that turns out to be one filing in one court. This page keeps the small number of changes that alter what a product team should actually do, and names where each one came from.
Standards pages on this site carry the detail. This page carries the dates.
What has changed
Five items, newest first, each with the date it happened and the source we read it on.
-
The ADA Title II compliance dates moved by a year
The US Department of Justice extended the dates on its web and mobile app rule for state and local government. Public entities with a population of 50,000 or more now have until 26 April 2027, and smaller entities and special district governments until 26 April 2028.
The technical standard did not change. It is still WCAG 2.1 Level AA, set by the final rule published on 24 April 2024. Read the Department of Justice fact sheet on ADA.gov.
-
The European Accessibility Act applies
Directive (EU) 2019/882, the European Accessibility Act (EAA), has applied since 28 June 2025. Member States had to put it into national law by June 2022, which means the enforcement dates and penalties differ from country to country even though the requirements are shared.
It covers products and services including e-commerce, banking, transport services, e-books, smartphones and computers. Most organisations test against EN 301 549 to meet it. Read the European Commission page on the European Accessibility Act.
-
A version of EN 301 549 built on WCAG 2.2 exists
The 2026 version of EN 301 549 uses WCAG 2.2, according to the W3C Web Accessibility Initiative. For the Web Accessibility Directive, the version harmonised in the Official Journal is still v3.2.1, referenced in August 2021, which builds on WCAG 2.1.
Publication and harmonisation are two different steps. A new version of a standard changes legal obligations in the European Union only once it is referenced in the Official Journal, so a released version is a signal rather than a switch. Read the European Commission page on changes to EN 301 549.
-
WCAG 2.2 has an ISO twin
WCAG 2.2 was published on 5 October 2023 and updated on 12 December 2024, and it is also an approved ISO standard, ISO/IEC 40500:2025, matching the October 2023 text. The World Wide Web Consortium expects the December 2024 text to appear as ISO/IEC 40500:2026 by late 2026.
Two practical points. WCAG 2.2 does not replace WCAG 2.1, and content that conforms to 2.2 also conforms to 2.1, so work done to the newer version satisfies a clause that names the older one. And 4.1.1 Parsing is obsolete in WCAG 2.2, so a report that still scores it is reading from the wrong document. Read the W3C Web Accessibility Initiative overview of WCAG 2.
-
The Commission wrote about why complaints stay rare
The European Commission published a news item titled Why accessibility complaints remain rare despite widespread digital barriers. It is worth reading in full rather than in summary, and it is a useful reminder that a low complaint count is not evidence of an accessible market.
Find it from the Commission page on the European Accessibility Act.
Web accessibility lawsuits
Most web accessibility lawsuits in the United States are brought under Title III of the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) in a federal court. Where the defendant is a public body, the Department of Justice brings the claim itself under Title II, which is the route that produced the rule described above.
Courts have not agreed on every question, including whether a website on its own is a place of public accommodation. The answer has differed between circuits, which is why a claim filed in one state can look unlike the same claim in another. Enforcement also arrives as a settlement agreement or a consent decree as often as it arrives as a judgment, so the number of filed cases understates the activity.
From the product side, the shape is consistent. A demand arrives with a short deadline, the settlement names WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the benchmark, and both sides commission an expert to test the product against it. The team that already has a current audit, a list of open findings and a statement on file is answering a question it has already answered once.
Read what the ADA covers online · Or start with ADA compliance, explained
Where we read it
Seven sources. Each one publishes its own words, and every item above links back to the page it came from.
-
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative
The standards body itself: the WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) documents, the version history, and the news feed we check first. W3C WAI news and the overview of WCAG 2.
-
ADA.gov, US Department of Justice
The rule text, the fact sheets and the enforcement record for the Americans with Disabilities Act. ADA.gov.
-
Section508.gov, US General Services Administration
Procurement guidance and testing resources for federal buyers, written for the people doing the buying. Section508.gov.
-
European Commission
The European Accessibility Act pages, and the page that explains when a change to EN 301 549 reaches the law. Changes to the accessibility standard.
-
W3C policy pages
How each country's law uses WCAG, kept current by the same group that maintains the standard. India's policy page.
-
Guidelines for Indian Government Websites
The Indian government's own guideline set, published by the National Informatics Centre for the websites it runs. guidelines.india.gov.in.
-
GOV.UK accessibility blog
A public sector team writing about its own testing in the open, which is rarer and more useful than it sounds. accessibility.blog.gov.uk.
How to read a news story
Five questions sort a change worth acting on from a headline worth ignoring.
Does it name the source?
A story worth acting on points at the register, the agency or the standard body. If every link goes to the reporter's own article, wait for a second reading.
Is it a standard or a law?
A standard is published by a standards body. A law is passed by a legislature. Between the two sits harmonisation, which is what gives a standard legal effect in the European Union, and only the Official Journal decides that.
Which version and which level?
WCAG 2.1 and WCAG 2.2 are different documents with different criteria, and Level A, AA and AAA are different bars. A story that says only WCAG is telling you almost nothing.
Whose deadline is it?
A transposition date binds a government. A compliance date binds an organisation. They are years apart and they are not interchangeable.
Is the source selling something?
Including us. We sell accessibility testing, so read our claims with the same suspicion you would bring to a vendor's, and check the primary source we link to.
News questions
Do you publish every accessibility lawsuit?
No. We do not republish case reports, and we do not quote a count of filings, because a count without its method misleads more than it informs. When litigation changes what a product team should do, it appears on this page with the source beside it. Everything else belongs to the courts and the agencies, which we link to below.
A compliance date moved. Can we slow down?
The date moved and the work did not. A product that has to pass WCAG 2.1 Level AA in April 2027 needs the same audit, the same fixes and the same retest as one that had to pass in April 2026, and the testing takes the same time either way. We have never seen a deferred deadline reduce the size of the backlog.
Which standard should we test against?
Name the version your own obligation names, and test at Level AA. Where a law names WCAG 2.1, testing against WCAG 2.2 covers it, because content that conforms to 2.2 also conforms to 2.1. Where nothing names a version, WCAG 2.2 Level AA is the sensible floor, and we say which version every finding was tested against.
How often is this page updated?
When something verifiable changes: a rule is published, a date moves, a standard body releases a version or an agency changes its guidance. Every item carries its date and its source, and anything we have not read on a primary source does not go in.
Stop reading, start testing
One free page, tested by hand, with the findings written out.