Why Perceivio

Five reasons, each backed by how we work. No client stories yet, so we show you the method instead.

Book a free 30-minute audit call

Five reasons, backed

ManualManual testing comes first

Tools support our testers; they never replace them. Every issue in your report was confirmed by a person using assistive technology. Read the method.

CertifiedCertified testers, trained continuously

Our testers hold Trusted Tester certification and train on new tools and AI-driven interface changes as they ship. Meet the company.

UsableReports developers can use

Each issue shows steps to reproduce, where it sits in code and how to fix it. See a sample report.

RetestedEvery fix gets retested

We check each fix after your team ships it and confirm it works. How retests work.

ProofProof before you pay

The free one-page audit shows our method on your own product before you commit. Claim the free audit.

Certification, and what it proves

Two questions arrive together: are your testers certified, and can you certify our product.

The first has a short answer. Our testers hold Trusted Tester certification, the US federal testing credential for Section 508 work, and they train continuously as tools and frameworks change. Digital accessibility certification of this kind is a statement about a person's method: that they test in a documented order and record what they find. It is worth asking any supplier which certification their testers hold, and what the last thing they learned was.

The second answer is no, and nobody can give you a different one. There is no certification scheme that makes a product accessible, because accessibility is a claim about behaviour under real assistive technology rather than a badge. What exists is an audit against a named standard and level, with a date, and a statement you publish and stand behind. If a supplier offers to certify your website as accessible, ask which published scheme they are certifying it under, and read the scope of what was tested.

What we will put in writing instead

  • The standard and the level every finding was tested against, by version, so a 2.1 claim and a 2.2 claim never blur.
  • The scope, naming the pages, flows, apps and documents covered, and the ones left out.
  • The method, including the assistive technology and device combinations each finding was confirmed on.
  • The date, because an audit is a picture of a product on a day, not a permanent property of it.

Teams looking for a UX accessibility certification usually want proof that their designers can work to the standard. That is training rather than certification, and it sits inside consulting and support. Teams looking for someone to certify a product usually need an accessibility audit and testing and a website accessibility statement they can publish.

Book your free call

Judge us on one free page, then decide.